ABSTRACT
Background: Monitoring the spread of SARS-CoV-2 has been considered by the World Health Organization (WHO). We examined the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin antibodies in southwestern Iran in spring 2020. The circulation of SARS-CoV-2 is high in the general population, especially among health care workers (HCWs) who are in close contact with patients. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antigen in high-risk occupational and low-risk groups to investigate risk factors for serum positivity in Shiraz, southwestern Iran. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed on 366 participants (204 from high-risk and 162 from low-risk subjects). IgG and IgM antibodies were detected using Pishtaz Teb COVID-19 ELISA Kits to evaluate SARS-CoV-2-antigen in serum samples. After enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), serum prevalence, as well as IgG/IgM positive factors, was determined using logistic regression. Results: From July to September 2020 (a few months after reporting the first case of COVID-19 cases in Iran), out of 366 survived people, 72 (40.9%) were IgG positive, and 50 (27.5%) were IgM positive. The frequency of positive serology for IgG and IgM antibodies in individuals aged < 30 years was higher in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group. Multivariate logistic regression showed that headache (OR 0.312 [95% CI: 0.136 - 0.717]) and cough (OR 0.427 [95% CI: 0.182 - 1.004]) factors were associated with IgG or IgM positive serology. Conclusions: Between July and September 2020, the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antigen was high in Shiraz. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies in the high-risk group and their family as low risk was shown to increase viral infection due to close contact with COVID 19 patients than in the general population. Several factors were found to be related to the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antigen that needs to be considered by policymakers to determine what to do about the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Qualitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen assays based on immunochromatography are useful for mass diagnosis of COVID-19, even though their sensitivity is poor in comparison with RT-PCR assays. In addition, quantitative assays could improve antigenic test performance and allow testing with different specimens. Using quantitative assays, we tested 26 patients for viral RNA and N-antigen in respiratory samples, plasma and urine. This allowed us to compare the kinetics between the three compartments and to compare RNA and antigen concentrations in each. Our results showed the presence of N-antigen in respiratory (15/15, 100%), plasma (26/59, 44%) and urine (14/54, 28.9%) samples, whereas RNA was only detected in respiratory (15/15, 100%) and plasma (12/60, 20%) samples. We detected N-antigen in urine and plasma samples until the day 9 and day 13 post-inclusion, respectively. The antigen concentration was found to correlate with RNA levels in respiratory (p < 0.001) and plasma samples (p < 0.001). Finally, urinary antigen levels correlated with plasma levels (p < 0.001). Urine N-antigen detection could be part of the strategy for the late diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of COVID-19, given the ease and painlessness of sampling and the duration of antigen excretion in this biological compartment.
Subject(s)
Blood Group Antigens , COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , Kinetics , Respiratory System , RNA, Viral/genetics , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the burden of noninvasive group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections in ambulatory pediatrics before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in France. METHODS: We analyzed data from a national network of ambulatory pediatricians between 2018 and 2022. Clinicians evaluating children ≤15 years old for tonsillopharyngitis, perianal infections, paronychia/blistering dactylitis, and scarlet fever were invited to perform a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for GAS. Monthly incidence of noninvasive GAS infections per 10,000 visits was modeled using time series analysis, considering two breakpoints: March 2020 (first national lockdown) and March 2022 (end of mandatory mask-wearing in schools). RESULTS: Over the study period, 125 pediatricians recorded 271,084 infectious episodes. GAS-related illnesses represented 4.3% of all infections. In March 2020, the incidence of GAS diseases decreased by 84.5% (P <0.001), with no significant trend until March 2022. After March 2022, the incidence significantly increased (+23.8% per month, P <0.001), with similar patterns across all monitored GAS-related diseases. CONCLUSION: By using routine clinical data and RADTs, we have monitored changes in the incidence of noninvasive GAS infections in ambulatory pediatrics. COVID-19 mitigation measures have had a major impact on the epidemiology of noninvasive GAS infections, but their relaxation was followed by a surge above baseline levels.
ABSTRACT
Background: There is mounting evidence regarding the frequency and spectrum of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), but a search for causes has been elusive. Recently, a plasma-based assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen has been developed, which in initial use revealed that a high fraction of severely affected patients with PASC had circulating antigen. It is unknown whether detectable SARS-CoV-2 antigen is specific for PASC or how the assay performs in a broader clinical spectrum of patients with PASC. Method(s): We evaluated a cohort of patients with RNA-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection enrolled >=3 weeks following initial symptoms. Participants, both with and without PASC at enrollment, were identified via facility- and communitybased advertising and examined every 4 months. An interviewer-administered questionnaire ascertained presence of 30 different symptoms (new or worse compared to pre-COVID) in the prior 2 days at each exam. Using the single molecule array (Simoa) assay, we measured spike, S1, and nucleocapsid SARSCoV- 2 antigens in plasma collected at time of symptom assessment. Result(s): We examined 172 participants (50% men, 46% non-white, median age 46 years) who contributed 667 timepoints from 0.7 to 15.4 months following infection, at which 66% featured report of >=1 symptom. Sixty-one of 667 timepoints (9.1%) representing 24% of persons had >=1 detectable SARSCoV- 2 antigen. Among the 437 timepoints at which >=1 symptom was present, 9.8% had >=1 detectable antigen;this compares to 7.8% of timepoints at which symptoms were absent. In comparison to those without symptoms, individuals with several specific symptom complexes (gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and central neurologic) more commonly had detectable antigen (Figure). Hospitalization during acute COVID-19 was strongly related to antigen detection. Conclusion(s): Among a diverse group of SARS-CoV-2-infected persons in the post-acute phase of infection, SARS-CoV-2 antigen is detectable in plasma in both those with and without symptoms but more commonly in those with gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and central neurologic complaints. The findings indicate that antigen persists in at least some persons and suggest (but do not prove) that antigen is causally related to symptoms. That antigen is found in only a fraction of those with PASC indicates either that not all symptoms are driven by antigen, current plasma antigen detection is insensitive relative to tissue, or nominal PASC symptoms are sometimes unrelated to SARS-CoV-2. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection was an unprecedented pandemic with unprecedented global health and socio-economic impact. More than 13 million cases had been confirmed in Spain by August 2022, and diagnostic testing to detect cases of infection in the country has helped to partially mitigate the spread of the virus. In 2021, the first self-testing antigen tests were marketed for dispensing in community pharmacies, and over-the-counter dispensing was allowed from July of that year. The network of community pharmacies played a key role, not only in the informed dispensing of these tests, but also in actively participating in the performance, supervision and reporting of results to the health authorities, and even in the issuing of digital certificates. A compilation has been made of all the available data on the subject, with a deadline of 13 February 2022, which is considered to be the end of the sixth wave of the epidemic in Spain. The results of the action taken by community pharmacies in twelve Autonomous Communities, which somehow participated in these initiatives by carrying out or supervising a total of 1,043,800 tests, from which 109,570 positive cases (10.5% of the total) were detected and reported to the National Health System, are presented in this article. Although the results are provisional, because many of the programmes are still ongoing, they are a clear demonstration of the potential that community pharmacies can play in Public Health work.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (Panbio COVID-19 Ag, Abbott Rapid Diagnostics) is a lateral flow immunochromatographic assay targeting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleoprotein in nasopharyngeal specimens for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to verify the performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag for implementation in clinical laboratories. Method(s): Sixty nasopharyngeal swab specimens (30 positive and 30 negative) dipped in transport medium, and COVID-19 was confirmed using real-time RT-PCR using Allplex SARS-CoV-2 assay (Seegene), were tested using the Panbio COVID-19 Ag. Reproducibility was evaluated using positive and negative control materials. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on the results of realtime RT-PCR as the standard test method. Result(s): Reproducibility was confirmed by the consistent results of repeated tests of the quality control materials. The overall sensitivity and specificity of Panbio COVID-19 Ag were 50.0% and 100.0%, respectively. Panbio COVID-19 Ag demonstrated high sensitivity (88.2%) in analyzing the detection limit cycle threshold (Ct) value of 26.67 provided by the manufacturer as a positive criterion, and the sensitivity was 100.0% for the positive criterion of Ct values <25, although it was less sensitive for Ct > 25. Conclusion(s): Considering the high sensitivity for positive samples with Ct values <25 and the rapid turnaround of results, Panbio COVID-19 Ag can be used in clinical laboratories to diagnose COVID-19 in limited settings. Copyright © 2023 Ewha Womans University College of Medicine and Ewha Medical Research Institute.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Since the resumption of face-to-face education in October 2020, which was suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic, coincides with the period when SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in young adults are on the rise. This study focuses on the 2019 corona virus outbreak in young adults, the largest link in the chain of transmission, which can be defined as silent contagious agents. It is aimed to provide epidemiological data by detecting virus disease (COVID-19) seropositivity with two different serological methods, and to evaluate the symptom-test performance relationship of asymptomatic/mild symptom/symptomatic cases. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with students studying at Cappadocia University health programs between December 2020 and February 2021 and who will attend practice courses face-to-face. Participants were surveyed about their COVID-19 symptoms and disease histories based on SARS-CoV-2 exposure. For SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection, blood samples were taken from the participants and investigated with a single lateral flow immunoAssay (LFIA, Novatech, Turkey) cassette test. The samples with positive test result were then SARS-CoV-2 Anti-N IgM+IgG;SARS-CoV-2 Anti-S IgM+IgG;SARS-CoV-2 Anti-RBD IgG;It was re-evaluated using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) method with the anti-SARS-CoV-2 kit (Roche, Germany). Results: Of the 239 samples participating in the study, 50 (20.9%) samples that were positive for SARS-CoV2 IgM/ IgG according to the LFIA method were then studied again with the ECLIA method. According to the ECLIA result, 72% (36/50) of individuals against both nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) antigens, and 70% (35) against RBD antigen were seropositive. Based on the ECLIA test results, 239 samples were studied and 50 samples were found to be IgM/IgG positive, with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 93%. Contingence history was reported in 46% (n=23) of patients who were seropositive by both methods, while 30% (n=15) showed a COVID-19 clinic. Fifty four percent (n=27) of the participants reported that they did not have a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, but antibody response was observed in all of them. Only 28% (n=14) of seropositive patients reported positive PCR results, and 4% of them stated that they had a chronic disease. It will be important to continue to observe the serological status of young people, particularly in the context of new COVID-19 variants and in the low interest in mass vaccination campaigns targeting young people. Conclusion: It is thought that the performance of ECLIA with rapid casette test does not have a good degree of agreement and confirmation with different immunoassay tests would be more useful for epidemiological surveillance. Especially the new COVID-19 in the context of the variants and targeting youth due to the lack of interest in vaccination champaigns continue to monitor the serological status of young people it will be important.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Molnupiravir is an essential oral antiviral agent against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, its real-world effectiveness has not been evaluated in patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD). METHODS: This multi-centre retrospective study, involving 225 patients undergoing HD with initially mild or asymptomatic COVID-19, was conducted to compare the risks of 30-day COVID-19-related acute care visits between patients receiving and not receiving molnupiravir. Patients who received molnupiravir were stratified by rapid antigen detection (RAD) test results on day 7 after disease onset to assess whether rapid molnupiravir introduction accelerated viral clearance. RESULTS: Thirty-day COVID-19-related acute care visits were reported in 9.41% and 21.74% of the molnupiravir and control groups, respectively, and use of molnupiravir markedly reduced the risk of acute care visits after adjusting for baseline characteristics via propensity score weighting [hazard ratio 0.218, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.074-0.642; P=0.006]. The tolerability of molnupiravir in the enrolled patients was generally acceptable, with only 11.88% of molnupiravir users reporting mild adverse events. Moreover, rapid initiation of molnupiravir within 1 day of COVID-19 onset was an independent predictor of conversion to a negative RAD test result on day 7 after disease onset (odds ratio 6.207, 95% CI 2.509-15.358; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Molnupiravir is well tolerated and decreases the medical needs in patients with COVID-19 undergoing HD. Furthermore, the rapid initiation of molnupiravir accelerates viral clearance in patients with COVID-19 undergoing HD. These findings highlight the therapeutic role of molnupiravir for this vulnerable population.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Renal Dialysis , Treatment Outcome , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Corona Virus Disease 2019 (2019-nCoV) antigen detection reagent (colloidal gold method) has been applied to people who go to basic medical and health institutions for medical treatment and have respiratory tract, fever and other symptoms within 5 days, isolate observers, community residents who need antigen self-testing. The wide application of the reagent can effectively shorten the detection time, reduce the detection cost and time cost, and alleviate the pressure of nucleic acid detection. The article details the structural components, testing principles, production process and key risk points of the new coronavirus antigen test reagents, with the aim of providing a reference for the development of relevant work specifications for manufacturers, the organization of safe production and the verification and supervision of regulatory authorities.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Gold ColloidABSTRACT
Herein, a ternary PdPtRu nanodendrite as novel trimetallic nanozyme was reported, which possessed excellent peroxidase-like activity as well as electro-catalytic activity on account of the synergistic effect between the three metals. Based on the excellent electro-catalytic activity of trimetallic PdPtRu nanozyme toward the reduction of H2O2, the trimetallic nanozyme was applied to construct a brief electrochemical immunosensor for SARS-COV-2 antigen detection. Concretely, trimetallic PdPtRu nanodendrite was used to modify electrode surface, which not only generated high reduction current of H2O2 for signal amplification, but also provided massive active sites for capture antibody (Ab1) immobilization to construct immunosensor. In the presence of target SARS-COV-2 antigen, SiO2 nanosphere labeled detection antibody (Ab2) composites were introduced on the electrode surface according sandwich immuno-reaction. Due to the inhibitory effect of SiO2 nanosphere on the current signal, the current signal was decreased with the increasing target SARS-COV-2 antigen concentration. As a result, the proposed electrochemical immunosensor presented sensitive detection of SARS-COV-2 antigen with linear range from 1.0 pg/mL to 1.0 µg/mL and limit of detection down to 51.74 fg/mL. The proposed immunosensor provide a brief but sensitive antigen detection tool for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Biosensing Techniques , COVID-19 , Metal Nanoparticles , Humans , Metal Nanoparticles/chemistry , SARS-CoV-2 , Immunoassay , Hydrogen Peroxide/chemistry , Silicon Dioxide , COVID-19/diagnosis , Antibodies , Antibodies, Immobilized/chemistry , Gold/chemistry , Electrochemical Techniques , Limit of DetectionABSTRACT
The last both authors contributed equally Purpose To design clinical and public health policies, including immunization, during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical to monitor not only infections due to SARS-CoV-2 but other pathogens as well. We evaluated interim results from the first year of a multi-site study of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and early onset hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in Germany to assess the contribution of different pathogens over time. Methods This multicenter trial is being conducted from January 2021 to December 2023 at three hospitals in Thuringia: Jena University Hospital (1396 beds), SRH Hospitals Gera (951 beds) and Suhl (653 beds). Adult hospitalized patients with CAP/early onset HAP are identified by a screening algorithm which includes assessment by a study physician. Study procedures included: health data collection, urine specimens (using S. pneumoniae serotype-specific urinary antigen detection assays (UAD-1/2) and BinaxNOW), and nasopharyngeal swabs (analyzed by multiplex microbiological analysis), disease severity assessments, mortality (follow-up to day 90), pathogen spectrum, and quality of life (follow-up to day 180). Results Within the first year (2021), 760 patients (58 % male, 70 % >= 60 years) were enrolled. ICU admission occurred in 16.1 % of cases, and 9.2 % required mechanical ventilation. Pathogens were identified for 553 cases. SARS-CoV-2 was identified in 78.4 % in the first half of the year while S. pneumoniae was detected in 6 cases (2.1 %;2/6 as a co-infection (0.7 %)). Other respiratory viruses were detected in 18 of 338 cases, of which 15 (4.2 %) were coinfections with SARS-CoV-2. In the second half of 2021, SARS-CoV-2 was identified in 58.3 % of cases, however, other pathogens occurred more frequently including S. pneumoniae 10.2 % (n/N = 34/333;13/34 as a co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 (3.9 %)) and other respiratory viruses 11.4 % (n/N = 41/360;11/41 as a co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 (3.0 %)). Influenza was not detected. Conclusion While SARS-CoV-2 remained the most common pathogen among patients with CAP/early onset HAP during the study year, other pathogens reemerged during the second half of 2021. Correspondingly, co-infections with SARS-CoV-2 increased, with pneumococci as the leading pathogen.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The most widely used marker for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) is the detection of galactomannan by ELISA. This study describes the evaluation of the results obtained by Euroimmun Aspergillus antigen ELISA (EIA-GM-E) in serum samples and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) from patients at risk of IA, and compares these results with those obtained by Bio-Rad Galactomannan EIA (EIA-GM-BR). Method(s): Anonymous retrospective case-control comparative study in 64 serum samples and 28 BAL from 51 patients. Result(s): Overall agreement of the results of the two assays was observed in 72 of 92 samples (78.3%). The sensitivity of EIA-GM-BR and EIA-GM-E in serum samples was 88.9% and 43.2%, respectively, and 100% and 88.9% for BAL. The specificity of EIA-GM-BR and EIA-GM-E in serum samples was 91.9% for both assays, and 68.4% and 84.2% in BAL. There were no statistically significant differences in the results of both assays. Conclusion(s): Both methods show good results for the discrimination of patients with IA when BAL is tested, or serum in case of EIA-GM-BR.Copyright © 2021 Sociedad Espanola de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica
ABSTRACT
Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is one of the most common analytical platforms for point-of-care testing (POCT), which is capable of large-scale primary screening and home self-testing of infectious diseases. However, the sensitivity of conventional AuNPs-based LFIA is relatively low and more prone to false negatives. Herein, we report a novel LFIA based on gold-core-silver-shell bimetallic nanoparticles (Au4-ATP@Ag NPs) emitting Surface-enhanced Raman scatting (SERS) and Photothermal (PT) effect, named SERS/PT-based dual-modal LFIA (SERS/PT-dmLFIA), for the antigen detection of infectious diseases pathogens, which displayed an excellent performance. For influenza A virus (IAV), influenza B virus (IBV), and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) N protein detection, the limit of detections (LoD) with Raman as signal were 31.25, 93.75, and 31.25 pg mL-1 respectively, and the LoDs with temperature difference (∆T) as signal were as low as 15.63, 187.5, and 15.63 pg mL-1 respectively, which were over 4-fold more sensitive than visual-based LFIA. The proposed SERS/PT-dmLFIA was used for detecting virus antigen in pharyngeal swabs and showed ideal coincidence rate of over 95% compared to the commercialized assays. In addition, we explored the development of multiplex SERS/PT-dmLFIA that can detect IAV, IBV, and SARS-CoV-2 antigens simultaneously without cross reactivity. Overall, the SERS/PT-dmLFIA for antigen detection not only exhibits high sensitivity, accuracy and specificity, but also have characteristics of rapidity and simplicity, which holds high potential for rapid diagnosis of infectious diseases in laboratory testing, mass screening, and home self-testing. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The goal of the present study was to assess the SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test's performance features and compare them to the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, the gold standard test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 cases. Method(s): From October 2020 to May 2021, patients attending the OPD, including those undergoing surgery, at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Telangana provided 1000 respiratory samples, primarily nasopharyngeal swabs. A skilled technician had collected two nasopharyngeal swabs from each person in a COVID sample collection room while wearing personal protective equipment and following strict infection control procedures. One swab was used for the rapid antigen test given by the standard Q COVID-19 Ag test kit and placed into the extraction buffer tube. Second swab was kept in the viral transport medium and used for AllplexTM 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene, Korea), which targets envelope gene (E), and RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and nucleocapsid (N) genes of SARS CoV-2, was used for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection according to the manufacturer's instructions. Result(s): Out of 1000 samples tested for COVID-19, 623 (63.7%) were males and 377 (36.3%) were females. Out of 1000 samples, 347 samples were RT-PCR positive and 653 were RT-PCR negative. Out of 347 RT-PCR samples positive, 341 were Rapid antigen test positive samples and six were negative. Overall sensitivity and specificity are 98.27% and 99.85%, respectively. Conclusion(s): The real-time RT-PCR assay's sensitivity and specificity were comparable to those of the rapid assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection. It can be utilized for contact tracing measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic in places such as border crossings, airports, interregional bus and train stations, and mass testing campaigns needing quick findings. This is especially true in areas with a high prevalence of the disease.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThere are conflicting reports on the performance of rapid antigen detection tests (RDT) in the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant; however, these tests continue to be used frequently to detect potentially contagious individuals with high viral loads.AimThe aim of this study was to investigate comparative detection of the Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron variants by using a selection of 20 RDT and a limited panel of pooled combined oro- and nasopharyngeal clinical Delta and Omicron specimens.MethodsWe tested 20 CE-marked RDT for their performance to detect SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron by using a panel of pooled clinical specimens collected in January 2022 in Berlin, Germany.ResultsWe observed equivalent detection performance for Delta and Omicron for most RDT, and sensitivity was widely in line with our previous pre-Delta/Omicron evaluation. Some variation for individual RDT was observed either for Delta vs Omicron detection, or when compared with the previous evaluation, which may be explained both by different panel sizes resulting in different data robustness and potential limitation of batch-to-batch consistency. Additional experiments with three RDT using non-pooled routine clinical samples confirmed comparable performance to detect Delta vs Omicron. Overall, RDT that were previously positively evaluated retained good performance also for Delta and Omicron variants.ConclusionOur findings suggest that currently available RDT are sufficient for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Serological Testing , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Berlin , COVID-19/diagnosis , Germany , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methodsABSTRACT
Background: SARS-CoV-2 has emerged as a novel pathogen of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Aims and objectives: We aimed to compare characteristics, clinical outcomes and pneumococcal identification in patients with COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 CAP. Method(s): EGNATIA is an ongoing, prospective study of adults >=19yo hospitalized with clinical and radiographicallyconfirmed CAP in Greece. The primary objective is to estimate the proportion of CAP due to pneumococcal serotypes included in 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13). Pneumococcus was identified using serotype-specific urinary antigen detection assays (UAD 1/2), BinaxNow and conventional cultures. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed as per national guidelines. Result(s): We compared 202 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia during Apr2020-Mar2021 vs 1033 patients with nonCOVID-19 CAP during Nov2017-Oct2020. Patients with COVID-19 were younger (median age 68.8 vs 75.8 years) and had fewer comorbidities (67.8% with >=1 underlying condition vs 79.2%) than non-COVID-19 patients. Patients with COVID-19 less frequently reported past pneumonia episodes (0.5% vs 7.7%) but were more frequently nursing home residents (13.9% vs 6%). Patients with COVID-19 had less severe pneumonia presentation (CURB 65 3-5 6.4% vs 30.5%;PSI IV-V 41.1% vs 55.2%) but required mechanical ventilation more frequently (7.4% vs 1.9%) and had a longer hospital stay (mean 17.4 vs 9.6 days). In-hospital mortality was similar between the 2 groups (7.9% in COVID-19 vs 8.9% in non-COVID-19). Pneumococcus was identified less frequently in patients with COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 CAP (4% vs 11.1%). Conclusion(s): Significant differences were identified in patients with COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 CAP.
ABSTRACT
Background: A novel coronavirus disease, 2019-nCoV (COVID-19), was reported first in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei, China, in late December 2019 and subsequently reached pandemic level affecting around 213 countries. As of 24th May 2020, the total number of positive cases confirmed is 5,446,514 and 344,754 death reports worldwide. COVID-19 infection causes pneumonia-like severe respiratory infection and acute lung failure. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coron-avirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA beta coronavirus that is a confirmed causative agent of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 may use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), unlike the receptor utilized by SARS-CoV (emerged in 2002) to infect humans. People with a history of hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, cardiovascular disease are more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. Objective(s): The purpose of this review was to help the society to distinguish and deal with SARS-CoV-2, and make available a reference for forthcoming studies. Method(s): Recently, diagnostic primer sets on the SARS-CoV-2 genome have been identified. The receptor-binding domain of SARS-COV-2 highlighted the mode by which beta-CoV recognizes ACE2. Various diagnostic tools are available to differentiate and identify SARS-CoV-2 infection as RT-PCR, antigen detection assay, and antibody detection assay. Different strategies have been employed to control the SARS-CoV-2, considering various drug targets like the main protease (3-CLPro), papain-like protease (PLpro), helicase (NSP13), RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdR-p), and viral envelope (E) protein. Conclusion(s): In the present review, we have updated details of transmission, pathogenesis, genome structure, diagnostic criteria, clinical characteristics, therapeutics, and vaccine development of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may be significant in the control and response to the COVID-19 out-break.Copyright © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers.
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the PanbioTM Covid-19 Ag Rapid Test (Abbott) in a medical center in Ouagadougou. The PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag test was evaluated from January 26 to March 31, 2021 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in the medical Centre of Kossodo. A total of 268 individuals were tested by both SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, and antigen RDT. Of these 268 individuals, 52 were positive and 216 were negative for COVID-19 RT-PCR. The performance parameters of the test and its Kappa agreement with the RT-PCR were calculated according to the presence or absence of symptoms in the patients on one hand, and according to the time onset of symptoms on the other hand. The sensitivity of the PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test ranged from 29.63% (95% CI: 13.75 to 50.18) among COVID-19 asymptomatic patients, to 87.5% (95% CI: 52.91 to97.76) among symptomatic patients with symptom onset time of 1-5 days. Similarly, the PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test specificity was 97.3% (95% CI: 90.58 to 99.67) and 96.4% (95% CI: 91.81 to 98.82) in symptomatic and asymptomatic RT PCR negative patients. The PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test shows good performance in detecting COVID-19 cases in patients with a symptom onset time of less than seven (7) days. This performance is even better when the symptom onset is reduced to five (5) days. The results show that the antigen RDT is not suitable for COVID-19 detection among asymptomatic patients.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 infection was an unprecedented pandemic with unprecedented global health and socio-economic impact. More than 13 million cases had been confirmed in Spain by August 2022, and diagnostic testing to detect cases of infection in the country has helped to partially mitigate the spread of the virus. In 2021, the first self-testing antigen tests were marketed for dispensing in community pharmacies, and over-the-counter dispensing was allowed from July of that year. The network of community pharmacies played a key role, not only in the informed dispensing of these tests, but also in actively participating in the performance, supervision and reporting of results to the health authorities, and even in the issuing of digital certificates. A compilation has been made of all the available data on the subject, with a deadline of 13 February 2022, which is considered to be the end of the sixth wave of the epidemic in Spain. The results of the action taken by community pharmacies in twelve Autonomous Communities, which somehow participated in these initiatives by carrying out or supervising a total of 1,043,800 tests, from which 109,570 positive cases (10.5% of the total) were detected and reported to the National Health System, are presented in this article. Although the results are provisional, because many of the programmes are still ongoing, they are a clear demonstration of the potential that community pharmacies can play in Public Health work.